A Broken Scale
Everyone has a framework that they use for determining whether or not a law is good. They may not be conscious of it, or have thought through their heuristic, but like Brillat-Savarin, tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you where you stand on an issue and how you got there. For both American conservatives and progressives, the defining filter of the second half of the twentieth century right up to this moment is individualism. Self determination is the only good. The question then becomes one of utility: is the greatest threat to self-determination government overreach, or systems of power? The fed, or the corporate oligarch. One side says that a good law is one which does the least to impede the natural rights of the people. The other will say that the law needs to remove barriers to the enjoyment of human rights. Well, okay, they won't say those things, but that is back behind it. If you zoom out a little further, the one will believe that rights are negative; things you hav...